Creating a GPX File with Accurate Elevation for Hiking

Imagine standing at the base of a formidable peak, the paper map promising a 3,00-foot ascent. But is that a steady, grueling climb or a series of punishingly steep pitches? Without an accurate elevation profile, your plan is a guess. As an instructor in the world of digital mapping and GPS navigation, I’ve seen that guess lead to everything from missed summits to dangerous situations. Mastering the gpx file is the foundational skill that transforms that guess into a strategic, actionable blueprint. Learning how to create a gpx file is how you turn raw data—understanding its XML-based format and trackpoint data—into the wilderness instinct you need to hike safer, smarter, and with greater confidence.

This isn’t just about pushing buttons on a screen. It’s about understanding the language of the landscape before you ever set foot on the trail. We’re going to cover the essential anatomy of a GPX file, learning the critical difference between a “suggestion” (a Route) and a “command” (a Track) to ensure your GPS device follows your intended path. You’ll learn about the verifiable “ground truth” of Digital Elevation Models and why they’re superior to the fickle readings from on-device barometers. We’ll walk through step-by-step workflows for creating a clean 3D GPX file from scratch and fixing the most common errors you’ll encounter. Finally, we’ll move beyond simple numbers to analyze a trail’s true difficulty using metrics like slope and elevation gain/loss, turning that data into a real-world strategy for your hike.

What Is a GPX File and Why Is It Essential for Hikers?

Before you can master a tool, you have to understand how it’s built. A computer file with a .gpx extension isn’t a map; it’s a story—a precise set of digital instructions that can guide you through the wildest terrain. Deconstructing this format and its use for GPS data exchange is non-negotiable for anyone serious about digital navigation.

What Are the Foundational Rules of the GPX 1.1 Standard?

A GPX (GPS Exchange Format) file is, at its heart, a simple text file. It’s built on the XML schema, an open-source framework that makes it the universal standard for sharing waypoints, routes, and tracks between any GPS device and any piece of software. This universal language is its greatest strength. Every file begins with a root element, , within its headers/footers, which contains two key attributes: version=”1.1″ tells every program that it’s following the rules laid out in the 2004 standard, and creator=”string” identifies the software that generated it, like “Caltopo” or “GPX.Studio.”

To ensure that a point in Colorado is understood the same way as a point in Chamonix, the standard mandates that all latitude and longitude coordinates (often expressed as lat/lon coordinates) must use the WGS84 datum. This is the global coordinate system used by GPS satellites, guaranteeing worldwide consistency. Just as critically, all measurement units are metric. That tag—one of the core XML tags—represents meters, not feet, a common and potentially dangerous source of error for hikers in the United States.

The core philosophy of the GPX format prioritizes interoperability over data richness. This means it is lightweight and universally readable, unlike proprietary formats like Garmin’s .FIT or .TCX which are packed with extensive biometric data. This focus makes the GPX file the perfect tool for sharing the path—the 3D line of the hike—but not necessarily the performance of the hiker. To accommodate extra data without breaking the standard, the schema includes an optional tag. This “sandbox” allows vendors like Garmin to add proprietary data like heart rate or apps like OsmAnd to add custom track colors. But the heart of the file, the part we care about, is the tag for elevation information. It lives inside every track point, route point, or waypoint. A GPX file without it is just a “flat” or 2D file; it will display on a map, but it has no soul and no elevation profile. For a full technical breakdown, you can always reference The official GPX 1.1 schema, the primary source documentation from its creators.

Now that we understand the file’s container, let’s unpack the three distinct types of data it can hold. This distinction is the single most important factor for accurate navigation and is one of the fundamental building blocks of digital route planning.

What Is the Critical Difference Between a Track, a Route, and a Waypoint?

Inside a GPX file, you’ll find three types of geographic data, and confusing them is the number one mistake I see new digital navigators make.

Waypoints () are the simplest. They are single, standalone geographic points used to mark specific locations of interest, such as a “Trailhead,” “Summit,” or “Water Source.”

Routes () are an ordered list of significant waypoints (called route points, or ) that represents a planned journey. Think of it as a connect-the-dots drawing for your GPS. It contains only the key turns or “via” points, providing general directions for a future trip.

Tracks (), on the other hand, are the real deal. A track is a high-fidelity, densely-packed, ordered list of points () that represents a recorded or drawn path. This is your gpx course/route. It is the “breadcrumb trail” of where someone has actually been or, for our purposes, exactly where they plan to go. A track is structured with a parent tag, which contains one or more track segments (), each filled with potentially thousands of individual track points containing full latitude, longitude, elevation information.

Here’s the critical difference: when you load GPX file with a Route, you are giving your GPS device a suggestion. The device will look at your handful of route points and “recalculate” the path between them using its own internal map and algorithms. It effectively invents a new path and elevation profile. This recalculation is a massive source of frustration, as the device often creates the shortest path—straight up a scree field, for example—which can be useless for backpacking.

When you load a Track, you are giving the device a command. Because the file contains thousands of points of trackpoint data, each with its own elevation tag, the 3D path is already “baked in.” The device is instructed to follow that line of points exactly as provided. This guarantees a predictable and accurate elevation profile. The foundational principle I teach is this: Always create and follow Tracks.

Understanding that a Track is the only reliable format for a hiker, the next logical question is: where does the elevation data for each of those thousands of points actually come from? A well-made GPX track is a powerful tool for preparation, directly supporting the Seven Leave No Trace Principles, starting with “Plan Ahead and Prepare.” Understanding this is key to understanding how different hiking apps handle this data.

Where Does Elevation Data Come From? (A Hiker’s Dilemma)

Your elevation profile is only as good as its source data. For hikers, that data comes from two radically different places: on-device sensors that measure the air around you, and server-side models that have mapped the entire planet.

How Do Barometric Altimeters and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) Differ?

First, let’s look at Source 1: Barometric Altimetry. Found in high-end GPS watches and devices like the Garmin Epix gen 2 or older Garmin Dakota 20, a barometer measures “station pressure”—the weight of the column of air directly above it. As you hike uphill, that column of air shrinks, pressure drops, and the device cleverly converts this change into an altitude gain. The strength of a barometer is its extreme sensitivity and precision; it can detect elevation changes of just a few feet, providing a very high-resolution, granular profile of your movement. Its critical weakness, however, is barometric drift. The sensor is dumb; it cannot distinguish between a pressure drop from gaining altitude and one from an incoming storm. This drift leads to significant real-world inaccuracies. I once finished a loop hike where my Garmin watch claimed my car was now 1,000 feet higher than when I started, all because a weather front moved in. For a scientific look at this, you can read the National Weather Service pressure definitions.

Now for Source 2: Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). A DEM is a 3D model of the Earth’s “bare earth” surface, a massive grid of elevation values created from remote sensing data like satellite radar (SRTM) or aircraft-mounted LiDAR. The strength of a DEM is its high accuracy and stability. This DEM elevation data is verifiable “ground truth,” unaffected by weather, time of day, or sensor drift. Its primary weakness is resolution. A common 30-meter DEM stores one average elevation value for every 30×30 meter square. This causes the model to “smooth over” sharp ridges, miss narrow canyons, and report an average elevation for a cliff edge, rather than the precise point where you are standing. You are a point, but a DEM provides data for a square. This becomes particularly important when dealing with different coordinate systems; while most tools work in WGS84, raw data from an Ordnance Survey map might be in OS Grid references (easting, northing) and require coordinate conversion to be useful.

Given that both systems have clear flaws, modern devices and planning tools create a more reliable reading by fusing them together. They use the stable DEM data to provide a baseline and the sensitive barometer to measure small changes from that baseline.

Pro-Tip: Before starting a hike where you’ll be recording with a barometric watch, manually calibrate the altitude. Use a known elevation from a trailhead sign or a topographical map. This gives your device the most accurate starting point possible and can help minimize the impact of barometric drift throughout the day.

Which DEM Is the Most Accurate for Trip Planning?

When you’re engaging in outdoor activity route planning, the quality of your elevation profile depends not on the tool you use (like Caltopo or Gaia GPS) but on the underlying DEM dataset that tool uses. Different applications leverage different DEM sources, creating a clear hierarchy of accuracy. A trip planned in the United States has access to much higher-resolution data than a global trip.

The difference in quality is staggering. 3DEP (USGS) is the “gold standard” for the United States, created from LiDAR and offering resolutions from 1 to 10 meters. It is the most accurate and highest-resolution data available. SRTM (NASA) is the “global workhorse,” offering 30-meter resolution for most of the globe. As a radar-based sensor, it penetrates clouds but can have data voids in very steep terrain. The vertical accuracy, measured by Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), tells the story: 3DEP has an RMSE of ~0.5-0.8m, while SRTM and ASTER are closer to ~19m. Therefore, a hiker planning a trip in the US should preferentially use a tool like Caltopo that leverages the USGS 3DEP dataset to achieve the highest possible accuracy. For more information, the USGS provides a great overview of their About 3DEP Products & Services.

Armed with the knowledge of what a GPX file is and where its elevation data comes from, we can now move to the practical, step-by-step process of creating one.

How Do You Create a 3D GPX Track from Scratch? (5 Proven Workflows)

This section provides actionable, step-by-step instructions for creating a clean 3D GPX track file. Each method caters to different user needs and device compatibility, but the goal is always the same: a reliable, data-rich file you can trust in the field.

Workflow 1: How Do You Use Modern Web Planners Like Caltopo and Gaia GPS?

Modern web planners are dominant platforms, prized for their rich map layers and analytic tools. Caltopo is praised for its powerful analysis. A user selects the “Draw Line” tool and clicks points on the map, and Caltopo displays a detailed elevation profile in real-time by querying its high-resolution DEM stack. However, there’s a critical issue I call the “Caltopo Flat-File” Problem: when you export GPX file as a drawn line, Caltopo only exports the 2D latitude and longitude data, not the elevation. The resulting GPX file is “flat.” The solution requires a second step: taking that flat 2D file and using a tool like GPSVisualizer to add elevation data back in.

Gaia GPS is lauded for its mobile app and “Snap-to-Trail” routing, which uses data from the OpenStreetMap project to automatically plot a route along known trails. Its app compatibility extends across most modern devices, as does that of similar apps like Locus Map and Rever. Its elevation profile is generated from an internal mix of DEMs. A noted weakness is that Gaia’s elevation gain calculations can be “understated,” likely due to an aggressive data-smoothing algorithm that “blunts” the profile and removes smaller, rolling hills. Despite their user-friendly interfaces, both platforms have quirks that can result in inaccurate or incomplete elevation data if the user is not aware of the underlying processes. You can see a full breakdown of the pros and cons of these top hiking apps to decide which is right for you.

Because even modern planners can produce flawed files, it’s essential to know the classic, “bulletproof” method that guarantees a perfect 3D track every time.

Workflow 2: How Do You Use the Classic Google Earth + GPSVisualizer Method?

This multi-step process is the most reliable, “bulletproof” method for creating a 3D GPX track and is the universal fix for any “flat” file.

• Step 1: Draw Path. In the Google Earth Pro desktop app, use the “Add Path” tool to click-by-click. This marker placement draws your intended hiking track on the high-resolution satellite imagery, giving you unparalleled visual control.
• Step 2: Save as KML. Google Earth cannot export directly to GPX. You must save the path as a KML file. This exported file is “flat”—it contains only 2D latitude and longitude data.
• Step 3: Go to GPSVisualizer. Navigate to the free web utility GPSVisualizer.com and find the “Convert to GPX” form.
• Step 4: Upload & Configure. Upload the 2D KML file you created in Google Earth.
• Step 5: Enrich Data (THE KEY STEP). Find the option labeled “Add DEM elevation data.” From the dropdown menu, select “Best available source.” This is one of the most reliable conversion methods.
• Step 6: Convert. Clicking “Convert” initiates the process. GPSVisualizer takes your 2D KML file, queries its high-resolution DEM database for every single point on the path, and generates a new, 3D GPX file. This process is the most common answer to how to convert KML to GPX. This new file will have the correct tag (in meters) written into every , creating a clean and accurate elevation profile. Adding DEM data is the source of ‘ground-truth’ elevation, a concept well-defined in the literature on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Terminology.

While that method is universally compatible, there are more streamlined options available today.

Workflow 3: How Do You Use a Streamlined, All-in-One Tool like gpx.studio?

This free, open-source, ad-free tool provides an elegant, all-in-one solution that combines the drawing capability of Google Earth with the data enrichment of GPSVisualizer. As a gpxplanner, gpx.studio is prized for its intuitive interface, privacy-focused local storage, and robust features for advanced file processing.

• Step 1: Start Drawing. Select “New GPX” and click on the map to place points.
• Step 2: Use Routing (Optional). The tool offers multiple editing modes. “Routing mode” can be activated to snap the line to trails using OSM data, or it can be left off for an “Off-road mode” to draw freely across any terrain. The tool offers different basemap types and overlays from sources like Mapbox, IGN, CyclOSM, and Waymarked Trails to suit your planning.
• Step 3: Add Elevation (Key Step). When finished drawing, select the “Elevation” tool from the toolbar and click “Request elevation data.” It also includes a cropping tool and a Waypoint Reducer tool to manage file size by removing unnecessary points.

When elevation is requested, the tool automatically queries Mapbox’s DEM data. It then adds the elevation data to every single point in the track you’ve drawn, creating a 3D-ready GPX file. This workflow effectively automates the two-part Google Earth + GPSVisualizer process into a single, seamless action. It is an excellent, accessible, and free option to create GPX file from scratch with minimal steps. You can see how various tools use different data sources in this DEM Product Comparison Guide from the USGS. This tool stands out when comparing the best free hiking apps available.

But what if you aren’t starting with a map at all, but with a list of coordinates from an old guidebook? That’s where troubleshooting comes in.

How Do You Troubleshoot and Correct Flawed Elevation Data?

Sooner or later, you’ll encounter a GPX file with a corrupted or missing elevation profile. This section equips you with the diagnostic skills to identify common errors and provides clear, actionable methods to edit GPX file.

What Are the Symptoms of Corrupted Elevation Data?

Recognizing the symptoms is the first step. Each one points to a different root cause and requires a different correction method.

• Symptom 1: Spikes and Drops (Noisy Data). The elevation profile looks like a heart monitor, with sudden, physically impossible spikes and drops. This is caused by GPS signal reception errors, such as “multipath interference” in canyons, or sensor errors on less sophisticated devices like phones. This is a well-documented phenomenon in scientific papers about Extracting Stops from Noisy Trajectories.
• Symptom 2: “Flat-lining” (Missing Data). The 2D track on the map looks perfect, but the elevation profile is a completely flat line. This is caused by a file that has no tags, which is the result of the “Caltopo flat-file” problem or exporting a drawn path from Google Earth without enriching it.
• Symptom 3: Barometric Drift (Inaccurate Data). A recorded track from a Garmin GPS watch shows a start and finish elevation that are hundreds of feet different, even though they are the same physical location. This is always a barometric altimeter problem. The air pressure changed during the hike, and the watch’s “base” elevation reading drifted.

Knowing how to fix these issues is a crucial data triage skill for any serious hiker. For the technically inclined, this can even involve opening the computer file in text editors like Notepad++ to manually inspect the XML tags.

How Can You Fix Corrupted GPX Files?

There are two primary philosophies for fixing bad data: nuking it or sanding it.

Method 1: DEM Replacement (The “Nuke” Option). This method is best for Flat-lining (Symptom 2) and Barometric Drift (Symptom 3). The concept is to discard all the bad or missing elevation data from the file and replace it, point for point, with good elevation data queried from a high-quality DEM. The primary tool for this is GPSVisualizer. Upload the “bad” GPX file, and in the “Convert to GPX” form, select “Add DEM elevation data” -> “Best available source.” The output will be a new, clean, and accurate file based on ground-truth data, completely overwriting the original flawed elevation. Strava also offers a “Correct Elevation” feature that performs the same function.

Method 2: Data Smoothing (The “Sanding” Option). This method is best for Spikes and Drops (Symptom 1). The concept is to use a statistical algorithm to average each point’s elevation with its immediate neighbors, effectively “sanding down” the sharp, erroneous spikes. Tools like the web-based gpx-smoother or the command-line tool GPSBabel can apply this fix. However, smoothing is a dangerous trade-off. While it removes false ascent from spikes, it can also remove real ascent by “blunting” the profile and smoothing over small, rolling hills, leading to understated total gain figures.

Pro-Tip: Always work on a copy. Before you “nuke” or “sand” a GPX file, save a duplicate of the original track. This ensures that if the correction process introduces new errors or removes too much detail, you can always go back to the source data and try a different approach.

This problem of “understated” or “inflated” numbers leads directly to one of the most misunderstood aspects of elevation analysis: the total ascent figure. Being well-prepared with accurate data is an ethical imperative, a modern extension of The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Leave No Trace Principles. Correcting technical ‘pain points’ like bad data is just as important as knowing how to prevent and treat hiking blisters—both are critical preparation skills.

How Do You Translate a GPX File into Actionable Hiking Strategy?

A perfect GPX file is useless if you can’t interpret it. This is where we move beyond data creation and into advanced activity analysis and data visualization, teaching you how to read the story your GPX file is telling to make smarter decisions about pacing, effort, and safety.

Why Is “Total Ascent” a Misleading Metric?

Hikers often discover that planning a route in Caltopo, exporting to Gaia, and recording on a Garmin yields three different “total ascent” numbers for the exact same hike. This discrepancy exists because “Total Ascent” is an algorithm, not a fact. The raw calculation seems simple: loop through all track points, find the positive elevation changes (gains), and add them up. However, raw GPS data is noisy. If every 1-foot spike from a data error is counted, the total elevation gain/loss will be massively inflated.

To prevent this, every application first applies a smoothing algorithm or a minimum gain threshold. One app might have a 10-foot threshold (ignoring all gains less than 10 feet), while another has a 3-foot threshold. This arbitrary value, set by the developer, is the only reason the “total ascent” numbers differ between platforms. Therefore, you should stop obsessing over a 10% or 20% difference. It is a meaningless comparison. The shape of the profile is what truly matters.

If total ascent is a flawed metric, what should you analyze instead? The answer lies in the grade of the trail itself. Professional guides don’t just look at total gain; they assess the technical and conditional requirements for hiking to understand the real challenge. Critiquing the ‘total ascent’ metric is a step towards a deeper guide to effective hiking pacing.

How Can You Use Slope Profiles and Difficulty Scales for Better Planning?

A standard elevation profile (Elevation vs. Distance) is good, but a slope profile (Steepness % vs. Distance) is far more valuable for strategic planning. The calculation is Grade (%) = (Elevation Gain / Horizontal Distance) * 100. This data answers critical questions that “total gain” cannot, such as “Is the climb one monster ascent or lots of rolling hills?” You can analyze a slope profile to determine sections for power-hiking (e.g., 20% grade) versus sections that are runnable (e.g., -4% grade), allowing for accurate pacing and energy management plans. Tools like Caltopo’s “Slope Angle Shading” layer visualize this data directly on the map, which is critical for assessing avalanche risk or trail steepness.

Creator’s Note: An infographic called “Anatomy of a Climb” would be perfect here. It would show two profiles for the same hike. The top profile is a standard Elevation vs. Distance chart. The bottom profile is a Slope % vs. Distance chart, with color-coded sections for ‘Runnable Descent’ (< -5%), ‘Easy Walking’ (0-8%), ‘Power-Hiking’ (8-20%), and ‘Scrambling’ (>20%).

The final step is to connect this quantitative GPX data to qualitative, recognized difficulty ratings like the Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) or the Swiss Alpine Club (SAC) Hiking Scale. For example, a GPX slope profile showing sustained, very steep grades (>30%) likely indicates YDS Class 3 terrain, where hands are required for scrambling. The SAC scale is even more granular (T1-T6). A route classified as T4 (Alpine Hike) implies the trail may be “missing in places,” requiring advanced navigation skills. You can read the official definitions for The SAC Mountain and Alpine Hiking Scale directly from the source.

At T4 and above, the GPX file’s role fundamentally changes. It is no longer a backup to the trail; it is the trail. You are navigating point-to-point by the GPX file itself in the absence of a physical path. If this sounds like your kind of adventure, you should read a complete guide to scrambling on Class 2, 3, and 4 terrain.

The Hiker Preparedness Layer: A Strategy Beyond the Map

This is where true mastery lies: translating the abstract data of a GPX file into concrete on-trail safety practices. A Hiker Preparedness Layer is a mental model where you overlay the GPX data with your personal capabilities and logistical needs. For a challenging route like the San Gorgonio Skyline Trail or the Wonderland-Gunsight Loop, analyzing the slope profile allows for strategic elevation-based pacing and informs gear selection. A section with sustained 25% grades means you’ll want trekking poles and might need to adjust your hydration plan. You can also add waypoint markers not just for turns, but for strategic Leave No Trace checkpoints—reminders to check your position relative to a fragile meadow or a key water source that needs protection. This Hiker Readiness Integration transforms the GPX file from a simple line on a map into a dynamic tool for responsible and successful hiking.

How Can a GPX File Promote Responsible, Leave No Trace Hiking?

A GPX file is more than a navigation tool; it’s an essential component of modern, ethical outdoor recreation. It’s how we translate principles into practice on the ground.

How Do Tracks and Waypoints Embody Leave No Trace Principles?

A well-crafted GPX file is the digital embodiment of LNT Principle 1: Plan Ahead and Prepare. It ensures you know the route, water sources, and hazards before arriving at the trailhead. For Principle 2: Travel and Camp on Durable Surfaces, a GPX track is a powerful tool for preventing impact in pristine or off-trail areas. A responsible hiker can pre-plan a track that connects a series of custom GPS waypoints intentionally placed on durable surfaces like rock, gravel, or dry grass, preventing the creation of damaging “social trails” that harm fragile vegetation.

For Principle 3: Dispose of Waste Properly, waypoint definition can act as a digital compliance tool. You can create waypoints for all known “Water Sources,” then add waypoint for a “Designated Campsite” that is a verifiable 200 feet away from the water, ensuring you do not contaminate it. For Principles 4 & 7 (Leave What You Find / Be Considerate of Others), custom waypoints with descriptive names can alert you to sensitive areas. Waypoints like “Private Property Boundary,” “Sensitive Archeological Site,” or “Known Wildlife Area” can trigger a GPS device’s proximity alarm, preventing accidental violations. The Leave No Trace principles for Scouting America provide an authoritative framework for these practices.

Ultimately, a modern, data-rich GPX file transcends its role as a simple navigation tool, becoming an essential instrument for executing a low-impact hike. It connects the practical application of LNT to the comprehensive philosophy behind mastering outdoor ethics.

Conclusion

We’ve journeyed from the uncertainty of a paper map to the empowerment of a data-rich GPX file. The key takeaways are clear: accurate elevation profiling depends on using a Track (), not a Route, to prevent device-side recalculation. The most reliable source for that elevation data is a high-resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM), like the USGS 3DEP dataset, which provides verifiable “ground truth.” Robust workflows, such as using Google Earth combined with GPSVisualizer, provide a “bulletproof” method for creating and correcting these files. Finally, advanced analysis must move beyond the “fallacy of total ascent” and focus on a slope profile to understand a trail’s true difficulty, enabling better strategic planning for pace and effort.

Now that you can build a data-rich GPX file, explore our library of trail guides to put your new skills into practice on your next adventure.

Risk Disclaimer: Hiking, trekking, backpacking, and all related outdoor activities involve inherent risks which may result in serious injury, illness, or death. The information provided on The Hiking Tribe is for educational and informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, information on trails, gear, techniques, and safety is not a substitute for your own best judgment and thorough preparation. Trail conditions, weather, and other environmental factors change rapidly and may differ from what is described on this site. Always check with official sources like park services for the most current alerts and conditions. Never undertake a hike beyond your abilities and always be prepared for the unexpected. By using this website, you agree that you are solely responsible for your own safety. Any reliance you place on our content is strictly at your own risk, and you assume all liability for your actions and decisions in the outdoors. The Hiking Tribe and its authors will not be held liable for any injury, damage, or loss sustained in connection with the use of the information herein.

Affiliate Disclosure: We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. We also participate in other affiliate programs and may receive a commission on products purchased through our links, at no extra cost to you. Additional terms are found in the terms of service.